Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Systematic reviews of complementary therapies: an annotated bibliography
Penanda Bagikan

E-Book

Systematic reviews of complementary therapies: an annotated bibliography

Linde Klaus - Nama Orang; Johannes Thormahlen - Nama Orang; Andrew Vickers - Nama Orang; Maria Hondras - Nama Orang; Gerben ter Riet - Nama Orang; Brian Berman - Nama Orang; Dieter Melchart - Nama Orang;

Abstract
BackgroundComplementary therapies are widespread but controversial. We aim to provide
a comprehensive collection and a summary of systematic reviews of clinical trials in three
major complementary therapies (acupuncture, herbal medicine, homeopathy). This article is
dealing with acupuncture. Potentially relevant reviews were searched through the register of
the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, the Cochrane Library, Medline, and
bibliographies of articles and books. To be included articles had to review prospective clinical
trials of acupuncture; had to describe review methods explicitly; had to be published; and had
to focus on treatment effects. Information on conditions, interventions, methods, results and
conclusions was extracted using a pretested form and summarized descriptively. ResultsFrom a total of 48 potentially relevant reviews 39 met the inclusion criteria. 22 were on various pain syndromes or rheumatic diseases. Other topics addressed by more than one review were addiction, nausea, asthma and tinnitus. Almost unanimously the reviews state that acupuncture trials include too few patients. Often included trials are heterogeneous regarding patients, interventions and outcome measures, are considered to have insufficient quality and contradictory results. Convincing evidence is available only for postoperative nausea, for which acupuncture appears to be of benefit, and smoking cessation, where acupuncture is no more effective than sham acupuncture. ConclusionsA large number of systematic reviews on acupuncture exists. What is most obvious from these reviews is the need for (the funding of) well-designed, larger clinical trials.


Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
E-Book
Penerbit
: ., 2001
Deskripsi Fisik
-
Bahasa
English
ISBN/ISSN
-
Klasifikasi
NONE
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
-
Subjek
Medicine
Therapies
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
-
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • Systematic reviews of complementary therapies: an annotated bibliography
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2026 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?