Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of Results of a nationwide survey on practice patterns of Canadian obstetricians and gynaecologists regarding the mode of delivery after pelvic floor surgery
Penanda Bagikan

Artikel

Results of a nationwide survey on practice patterns of Canadian obstetricians and gynaecologists regarding the mode of delivery after pelvic floor surgery

Malabarey, Ola - Nama Orang; Lucia Farisello - Nama Orang; Lauren Gazzard - Nama Orang; Jens-Erik Walter - Nama Orang;

Abstract It is not uncommon to be challenged with the di-lemma of deciding the best mode of delivery in a patient with a history of previous pelvic floor surgery. We hypothesized that the trendwould be a predilection towards cesarean section delivery in the context of a previous pelvic floor surgery, es-pecially amongst Urogynaecologists. A nation-wide survey was sent through the Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Canada to all physician members to assess the practice patterns regarding the preferred mode of delivery after pelvic floor surgery. A hundred and three members replied. Forty-seven percent would recommend a cesarean section (CS) when pregnant after a previous midurethral sling (MUS), 27.2 % would allow vaginal delivery, 10.7 % would not be
affected in their decision by the MUS, 9.7 % would strongly advise against pregnancy and 4.9 % would suggest a cesarean section with a sterilization procedure. With a history of previ-ous pelvic organ prolapse surgery (POP), 54.4 % would sug gestaCSwhenpregnant,21.4%wouldstronglyadvise against pregnancy and only 15.5 % would allow the patient to deliver vaginally. Urogynaecologists are significantly more
likely to strongly advise a patient with a previous MUS against pregnancy, compared to their peers practicing general obstetrics and gynaecology (OBGYN) (p= 0.04) or maternal
fetal medicine (MFM) (p= 0.05). Larger studies and cleaguidelines advising physicians to the optimum mode of deliv-ery following a history of previous pelvic floor surgery are
strongly needed


Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
Artikel
Penerbit
USA : Springer., 2016
Deskripsi Fisik
-
Bahasa
English
ISBN/ISSN
DOI 10.1007/s10397-0
Klasifikasi
NONE
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
Gynecol Surg (2016) 13:159–164
Subjek
Medicine
obstetricians and gynaecologists
pelvic
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
-
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • Results of a nationwide survey on practice patterns of Canadian obstetricians and gynaecologists regarding the mode of delivery after pelvic floor surgery
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2026 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?