Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan

  • Beranda
  • Informasi
  • Berita
  • Bantuan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota
  • Pilih Bahasa :
    Bahasa Arab Bahasa Bengal Bahasa Brazil Portugis Bahasa Inggris Bahasa Spanyol Bahasa Jerman Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Jepang Bahasa Melayu Bahasa Persia Bahasa Rusia Bahasa Thailand Bahasa Turki Bahasa Urdu

Pencarian berdasarkan :

SEMUA Pengarang Subjek ISBN/ISSN Pencarian Spesifik

Pencarian terakhir:

{{tmpObj[k].text}}
Image of A comparative study of Essure® hysteroscopic sterilisation versus laparoscopic sterilisation
Penanda Bagikan

Text

A comparative study of Essure® hysteroscopic sterilisation versus laparoscopic sterilisation

Kathy, Niblock - Nama Orang; Connor Katie - Nama Orang; Morgan David - Nama Orang; Johnston Keith - Nama Orang;

Abstract The purpose of this study is to compare success rate, patient satisfaction, discomfort, procedure time and in-traoperative adverse events of hysteroscopic (Essure®) versus laparoscopic sterilisation. This study includes a retrospective case–control comparative study of 70 patients who had lapa-roscopic or hysteroscopic sterilisation performed. Systematic chart review for the documentation of preoperative counsel-ling, operative time, intraoperative complications, documen-tation of correct application of Essure® and Filshie® clips and duration of hospital staywas also done. Patient follow-up was arranged and a questionnaire completed including details of postoperative pain, satisfaction of procedure, recovery time and compliance with confirmatory hysterosalpingogram at-tendance and associated pain. The main outcome measures
were pregnancy rate following attempted tubal blockage, re-turn to normal activity and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomemeasures include patient discomfort, procedure time, device placement, compliance with hysterosalpingogram, postoperative complications and recovery time. There is a statistical difference in favour of Essure® for postoperative pain, operative time, return to work/normal activity and hos-pital staywith no difference in complications or pregnancy. As a conclusion, Essure® is a safe and effective alternative to laparoscopic sterilisation with significantly less procedure-related pain.


Ketersediaan

Tidak ada salinan data

Informasi Detail
Judul Seri
-
No. Panggil
Artikel
Penerbit
USA : Springer., 2014
Deskripsi Fisik
-
Bahasa
English
ISBN/ISSN
DOI 10.1007/s10397-0
Klasifikasi
NONE
Tipe Isi
-
Tipe Media
-
Tipe Pembawa
-
Edisi
Gynecol Surg (2014) 11:173–177
Subjek
Medicine
hysteroscopic sterilisation
laparoscopic sterilisation
Info Detail Spesifik
-
Pernyataan Tanggungjawab
-
Versi lain/terkait

Tidak tersedia versi lain

Lampiran Berkas
  • A comparative study of Essure® hysteroscopic sterilisation versus laparoscopic sterilisation
Komentar

Anda harus masuk sebelum memberikan komentar

Perpustakaan Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan
  • Informasi
  • Layanan
  • Pustakawan
  • Area Anggota

Tentang Kami

As a complete Library Management System, SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) has many features that will help libraries and librarians to do their job easily and quickly. Follow this link to show some features provided by SLiMS.

Cari

masukkan satu atau lebih kata kunci dari judul, pengarang, atau subjek

Donasi untuk SLiMS Kontribusi untuk SLiMS?

© 2026 — Senayan Developer Community

Ditenagai oleh SLiMS
Pilih subjek yang menarik bagi Anda
  • Karya Umum
  • Filsafat
  • Agama
  • Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
  • Bahasa
  • Ilmu-ilmu Murni
  • Ilmu-ilmu Terapan
  • Kesenian, Hiburan, dan Olahraga
  • Kesusastraan
  • Geografi dan Sejarah
Icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com
Pencarian Spesifik
Kemana ingin Anda bagikan?